Week 8 - YouTube, TeacherTube and the future of shared online video

YouTube holds many possibilities for use in Web 2.0 learning environments. Positives of YouTube is that it holds a wealth of information and allows for teachers and students to view subject matter that they will otherwise not have access to, all for free. It also can provide authentic and rich learning experiences for students, allowing them to learn, while they create YouTube clips for posting; in a learner-centered educational environment. YouTube can also create common experiences that encourage interaction and discussion, although YouTube is not the best medium for this interaction. That brings us to the negatives of YouTube. There is so much information on there, but because it employs a largely user-managed system of tagging and labeling video clips, the search function can be ineffective and frustrating. There are also varying degrees of quality of both content and execution, so although it may be a very good concept, the clip quality may be so poor that some of the effectiveness is lost. The biggest negative of using YouTube in an educational environment is that a lot of the content on there may not be appropriate for use in a educational setting; which is why TeacherTube may be a better resource for some teachers.

For this week, one of the articles I read was about Alex Juhasz, who created an entire course at Pizer College in California called Learning From YouTube. It was a student-led course, in that the students chose the content, which shows you how much Web 2.0 tools are changing learning conditions. For this course, it was held entirely on YouTube, all research had to be conducted on YouTube, and all assignments had to be posted on YouTube. Alex Juhasz said that she wanted to use this forum to encourage students to question why serious, political uses of media were not often represented on YouTube; which is largely because it exists for entertainment.

I'm curious to see how YouTube and TeacherTube becomes increasingly common in educational environments, and whether it will be YouTube or the schools that adapt more to fit the other.

Week 7 - Open Educational Resources

As part of my preparation for class this week, I viewed several of the lessons available on OERCommons.org (Open Educational Resources). I was most interested in the Physics lectures by Walter Lewin of MIT. I was amazed that all of this material is available online, but it made me wonder how many traditional classroom teachers are actually taking advantage of these incredible resources? This concept is another take on the digital divide, that traditionally refers to the gap between the haves and the have-nots when talking about technology and accessibility. However, another take on the digital divide in the huge gap between the digital knowledge of many of today's teachers and today's students. Students out there are so knowledgable in the ways of the web, but many teachers are not even aware that these resources exist so they don't use them. Also on the OER Commons website was a survey, that if you participated, you could view the results. As of the time I took the survey, there were 2483 responses. I found these results very interesting, because in answering several of the questions, the importance of knowing whether the materials were of high quality was reflected as the highest priority of those using the website. I think these results are indicative of a broader problem online right now, that teachers are hesitant to use many online materials because they are not aware of them, but also because they are unsure of the quality. Everyone right now is concerned with putting material online, but there doesn't seem to be a long term plan to police and maintain this material. This has the potential to become a real problem.

Week 6 - Free and Open Source Software

Free and open-source software has changed the software industry in ways that I don't think we can truly realize yet. The amount of skilled "hackers" out there who are continually working individually and together to create high-quality programs is truly amazing. On a side note, I found it very interesting to see the term hacker used in a positive way, when we are so used to seeing it used by the mainstream media in a negative way. I agree that free and open source software can be an excellent resource; but I think that many large corporations will be hesitant to use it; and traditional software will still be dominant in the near future. Also, as many of the articles this week pointed out, "free" can be a very deceiving term when used to describe open source software, because it doesn't accurately reflect the time that goes into developing and maintaining it; which has to be accounted for somewhere. An essential characteristic for open source software to be successful is the community that goes along with it that continually updates it.

Week 5 - Neo Millenial Learning

My main question is, just because you can get online almost anywhere, does that mean that people will use all of that accessibility for learning? Or are people just using it for entertainment and communication? One of the articles that I read this week was by Dieterle, E., Dede, C., & Schrier, K. (2007). “Neomillennial” learning styles propagated by wireless handheld devices. I found the portion of the article explaining Harvard's Handheld Devices for Ubiquitous Learning (HDUL) study interesting, mainly the fact that particpants did not correlate the use of handheld devices with online learning. As this study showed, people are still stuck in a rut where the believe that online learning occurs only while sitting at a traditional computer. We now know that you can learn anywhere, anytime. Although I found that part mildly interesting, I was fascinated by Schrier's Reliving the Revolution (RtR) experiment that was conducted at MIT. The study was designed to enable partipants to relive the Battle of Lexington through the eyes of 1 of 4 historical figures and play the part of historical detective as they are presented with different information at different points throughout their journey. Although I see the historical significance of this learning experiment as important, more important is that this exercise is also designed so that participants are encouraged to determine the validity of information that is presented to them throughout their journey through the battlefield. Thus, this is linking back to a critical digital literacy skill as was discussed last week, that although it is important for learners to be able to research for information, it is essential that they are able to examine the validity of the information. I like the fact that someone was able to capture this concept in a dynamic learning environment that provides such a rich experience for the learner.

Week 4 - Digital Literacy

The article on Teen Consumers by Lenhart & Madden (2005) brought a lot of questions to my mind. None of the statistics regarding internet use, movie/music downloading, or content creating really surprised me, but the attitude towards music downloading was disappointing. The attitude that "everyone is doing it" and that it's so easy to do, why shouldn't they do it is a very dangerous trend, and you can only wonder how long it will be until that attitude carries over into other aspects of life. There is no sense of personal responsibility, they even blame the availability of DVD and CD burners for sending mixed messages on whether you should be downloading. I think one way in which this attitude will continue to have a negative trend is in plagarism. The pervasive attitude out there is that if you find it on the internet, it is open season to use as yours (music, information, research).

I also read the tidbit on the ETS developing a standardized test on digital literacy; but sadly its use is not yet widespread. I think this is a great idea, and could possibly be considered even more valuable for today's generation than the SAT. I think that the most important digital literacy skill is to learn how to responsibly use the wealth of information available online. It was mentioned in several of the readings this week that this generation of internet users are fully capable of accessing the information out there, but don't quite know how to interpret that data and determine its validity. Although this is a skill that should be focused on in the K-12 learning environment, it also carries over into the corporate or higher education worlds as well, since today's workforce isbeing increasingly called upon to use the internet to obtain information. As the article by Jones-Kavalier & Flannigan (2006) pointed out, the current American economy depends on how efficiently Americans can obtain a new level of digital literacy. At least in the K-12 environment, often the student is more tech savvy than the instructor or the organization as a whole, which does not bode well for our ability to compete in the global marketplace.
As the Lenhart & Madden (2005) article noted, a huge amount of America's "E-Generation" are now content creators in that they are blogging, creating, and remixing information online. And that article was published in 2005, 3 years ago. The key to innovative instruction which will promote responsible digital literacy is to create learning environments that will allow students to take advantage of what they are already doing in their free time for educational use (similar to our blogging assignment for this class). I think the trend is out there, but is not as widespread as it needs to be.

Week 3 - Artificial Intelligence through google?

“Certainly if you had all the world’s information directly attached to your brain, or an artificial brain that was smarter than your brain, you’d be better off.” (Carr, citing Page, in Is Google Making Us Stupid?) No, no, no...yes, the idea of having all of that information so readily accessible it intriguing, but there is no way that humans can make all of that information meaningful. And if it is not meaningful, what good is all of the information? I won't even classify it as "knowledge", because it has not been processed. Maybe I am missing the whole point, but I don't see how anything like that would make us "better off".

What I am more concerned about, and the article didn't really focus on this, but what is all of this time spent online and texting doing to our ability to communicate? And again, by communicate, I am inplying meaningful communication. Sure, you can say that we are communicating more and better than ever before....you have news? Send a mass email out to all of your email address book? What could be better than that? Your friend's dog dies? Shoot her a quick text, that way you don't have to bother her (or you) with a phone call. Surely our communication has improved! But like all of the time spent online is reshaping our neural circuitry, all of our time spent communicating in such a trivial, superficial manner is surely reshaping our ability to be able to engage in meaningful conversation and really communicate with one another. I can't remember where I read this, but some article I read recently talked about how the first few minutes of most mobile calls are spent discussing where each party is located. The article pointed out, why?? and who cares?? Since when has a person's present location become a hot topic of discussion? We are communicating too much, just for the sake of communicating, but it is not meaningful.

Week 2 - Why are we so behind?

Ideas are spreading faster than ever, we have the ability to learn with people across the globe, and learning environments continue to become more open. These all have advantages, as the accessibility of education is astounding, but you sometimes have to question the quality. Are we sacrificing quality for quantity? I don't know the answer to that, but I do think that people should be more hesitant about accepting the validity of online knowledge that they are.

However, what concerns me more is that America as a nation does not seem to be keeping up with other countries in terms of e-learning. This is where the future of learning is, and we seem to be very slow to adapt.

On a side note, I spent some time on scribd the other night after class and I am fascinated by the amount of information on there. But again, you have to be careful about examining the quality.